District Evaluation Policy

Clifton Public Schools Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Policy 2009-2010

Teacher Evaluations

Clifton Public Schools Board of Education recognizes that the continuing evaluation of tenured teaching staff members is essential to the achievement of the educational goals of this district. The purpose of a program of evaluation will be to promote professional excellence and improve the skills of tenured teaching staff members, improve pupil learning and growth, and provide a basis for the review of teaching staff member performance. Tenured Clifton teachers are formally observed and evaluated a minimum of one time per schools year. Non-tenured teachers are formally observed and evaluated a minimum of three times per schools year.

The district teacher evaluation system is based on the National Board Standards for Accomplished Teaching and Certificated staff Standard of Teacher Performance. Our formal teacher evaluation process includes formal observations, walk-through observations, pre and /or post observation conferences, teachers works samples, a Teacher’s Professional Development Plan, progress in completing required Professional development hours and an extensive evaluator narrative. Student achievement outcomes and growth data are included in the evaluation process.

Results of the teacher evaluation system are used to inform tenure decisions, inform compensation decisions (withholding of increment), selection of teachers for specific roles and duties, and to inform teacher placement decisions. Both Tenured and non-tenured observations and evaluations are entirely narrative documents. No single rating or level is given on a summative performance evaluation.

CLIFTON TEACHER EVALUATION RESULTS

SY  2009-2010

Number of teachers meeting

The district’s criteria for acceptable performance

Number of teachers in district

Percent of teachers in district meeting these criteria

 

914

 

918

 

99.56%






  • Tenured Teacher Evaluation Policy
  • Non-tenured Teacher Evaluation Policy


  • Administrator Evaluations
     
    The Board of Education recognizes that the continuing evaluation of administrators is essential to the achievement of the educational goals of this district.  In order to ensure the greatest benefit to the district of a program of administrator evaluation, the Board shall provide adequate resources for supervision and professional development, time for the proper conduct of evaluations, and time for in-service training to encourage improvement in job performance. Tenured and non-tenured Clifton administrators  are formally observed and evaluated a minimum of one time per school year.
     
    The district administrator evaluation system is based on the New Jersey Professional Standards for School Leaders. Our formal administrator evaluation process includes formal observations and visits by the Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of Schools, walk-through observations of building, school climate indicators, Principal work samples, documentation of completed teacher evaluations, evaluator narratives, evaluation conferences and performance aligned to district goals. Student achievement outcomes and growth data are included in the evaluation process. 
     
    Results of the administrator evaluation system are used to inform tenure decisions, inform continuation of employment decisions, inform compensation decisions (withholding of increment), selection of administrators for specific roles and duties, to inform administrator placement decisions, to plan Proffesional development opportunities and to inform an administrators Proffesional Growth Plan, to . Both Tenured and non-tenured administrator evaluations are entirely narrative documents. No single rating or level is given on a summative performance evaluation.

    CLIFTON ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION RESULTS

    SY  2009-2010

    Number of principals meeting the district’s criteria for acceptable performance

    Number of principals in district

    Percent of principals in district meeting these criteria

     

     

    24

     

    25

     

    96%









  • Administrator Evaluation Policy